Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Burn scar regeneration with the "SUFA" (Subcision and Fat Grafting) technique. A prospective clinical study

Gargano F., Schmidt S., Evangelista P., Robinson-Bostom L., Harrington DT., Rossi K.

Prospective Study with a reported sample of 12 on Chronic Wound, Burns, Scar, published in JPRAS Open (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
JPRAS Open (2018)
Reported sample size
12
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
32158824
PMCID
PMC7061675
DOI
10.1016/j.jpra.2018.05.001
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

Background Treatment of burn scars with traditional surgical techniques is challenging due to recurrent contractures. Fat grafting has been previously used in small clinical series and results are often biased by lack of scientific validating methods. Fat grafting in clinical practice is often evaluated for its filler properties and rarely scientifically validated for its potential in dermal regeneration. Animal studies have shown dermal regeneration with new deposition and reorientation of the collagen fiber. Our study aims to apply the validity of in vitro studies to clinical practice. Methods Our study prospectively evaluated outcomes in 12 patients treated with the "SUFA" technique (Subcision and Fat Grafting) for debilitating contracted burns scars limiting range of motion. Results were evaluated clinically with the Vancouver scale and by range of motion at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Dermal regeneration was evaluated by looking at dermis thickening using high definition ultrasound and scar remodeling looking at reorientation and new deposition of collagen fibers with hematoxylin-eosin histology and monoclonal antibodies against collagen type 1 and 3. Results Statistically significant clinical improvements in range of motion of the affected joints was observed ( P Conclusions Our results present the first clinical scientific evidence of dermal regeneration in fat grafting. Usin

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research