Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Burn wound healing with injection of adipose-derived stem cells: a mouse model study.

Karimi H., Soudmand A., Orouji Z., Taghiabadi E., Mousavi SJ.

Narrative Review on Chronic Wound, Burns, Scar, published in Ann Burns Fire Disasters (2014) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Ann Burns Fire Disasters (2014)
Country
Italy
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
25249847
PMCID
PMC4158446
Citations
26

Abstract (original English)

Stem cells have shown promise with regard to the healing process of burn wounds. However, donor sites for these cells are still under investigation. The aim of this study is to review the efficacy of adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ADSCs) in accelerating wound healing of third degree burns in a mouse model. To this end, forty healthy male inbred Balb/c mice were selected and set up as an experimental model for third degree burn wounds. They were randomly divided into 3 equally sized groups: the ADSCs group, the mechanically prepared adipose tissue group, and the control group. The wounds were examined daily until the mice were sacrificed for tissue sampling in the 3(rd) week. Our results showed that wound surface area and eschar thickness were smaller in the ADSCs group throughout the study period, although there was no significant difference between the groups for decreasing values of wound area characteristics. In terms of wound healing parameters, lymphocyte and macrophage cell counts were larger in the ADSCs group compared to the other groups. Fibroplasia, collagen synthesis and remodeling were more aberrant in this group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in either of these observed differences (p>0.05). Although enzymatically prepared ADSCs seem a potential treatment in wound healing, our study of a mouse model burn wound revealed no significan

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research