Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Calciphylaxis: ongoing challenges and treatment opportunities with mesenchymal stem cells.

Wu D., Lu S., Hu J., Zeng M., Wu J., Li C.

Narrative Review on Chronic Kidney Disease, Scar, Chronic Inflammation, Immune Modulation, published in J Mol Cell Biol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Mol Cell Biol (2025)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
40097288
DOI
10.1093/jmcb/mjaf009

Abstract (original English)

Calciphylaxis is a rare, progressive disorder characterized by subcutaneous adipose and dermal microvascular calcifications, microthrombi, and endothelial damage. It mainly affects patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), which is also known as calcific uremic arteriolopathy. Skin biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis, but it is an invasive procedure. Calciphylaxis frequently results in ischemic and nonhealing ulcerations with a high mortality rate. A multidisciplinary targeted approach is the primary treatment method. Vascular calcification, which is a common complication in patients with CKD, cannot completely explain the rapid progression of calciphylaxis. This article reviews the advances in the epidemiological characteristics, risk factors, and diagnosis, including non-uremic calciphylaxis and visceral calciphylaxis, pathogenesis, associated animal models, and treatment of calciphylaxis. The scarcity of animal models that mimic the clinical presentation of calciphylaxis hampers the understanding of its pathogenesis. The acute effects on progressive vascular injury, including the induction of severe ischemia and inflammatory responses, have been emphasized. Actively listening to the voices of patients and their families and building a multidimensional research system with artificial intelligence technologies based on the specific molecular makeup of calciphylaxis pat

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansCalciphylaxisMesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationRenal Insufficiency, Chronic

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research