Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMed

Camouflage of Postburn Scarring Alopecia Using Nanofat Grafting and Follicular Unit Hair Transplantation.

Evin N., Guray Evin S.

Prospective Study on Burns, Scar, Hair Loss, published in Plast Reconstr Surg (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Plast Reconstr Surg (2023)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
37253046
DOI
10.1097/PRS.0000000000010759
Citations
9

Abstract (original English)

Postburn scarring alopecia on hair-bearing aesthetic subunits causes cosmetic disfiguring and psychological problems. Follicular unit extraction (FUE) hair transplantation is an effective technique for camouflaging postburn scarring alopecia. However, poorly vascularized and fibrotic scar tissue limits the viability of grafts. The mechanical and vascular characteristics of scar tissue can be improved by nanofat grafting. This study aimed to present the results of postburn scarring alopecia treatment using nanofat-assisted FUE hair transplantation. Eighteen patients who had postburn scarring alopecia in and around the beard were enrolled. Patients underwent single-session nanofat grafting and FUE hair transplantation at 6-month intervals. Twelve months after hair transplantation, the survival rate of transplanted follicular graft, scar improvement, and patient satisfaction were assessed by counting each transplanted follicle individually, using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, and using a 5-point Likert satisfaction scale, respectively. Nanofat grafting and hair transplantation were successfully performed without complication. All scars significantly improved in mature characteristics ( P < 0.00001 for patients; P < 0.00001 for observers). The survival and density rates of transplanted follicular units ranged from 77.4% to 87.9% (mean, 83.2% ± 2.5%) and 10.7% to 1

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
HumansAlopeciaCicatrixAdultFemaleHair FollicleBurnsMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research