Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMedOpen access

Can mobilization of bone marrow stem cells be an alternative regenerative therapy to stem cell injection in a rat model of chronic kidney disease?

Morsy S., Mansour MF., Abdo M., El-Wazir Y.

Animal Study on Chronic Kidney Disease, published in Physiol Rep (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Physiol Rep (2022)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
36065849
PMCID
PMC9446404
DOI
10.14814/phy2.15448
Citations
5

Abstract (original English)

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a priority health problem affecting 36% of Egyptians. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs) have multidifferentiation capacity and the ability to restore several types of cells including damaged renal cells. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is known to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells from bone marrow to the peripheral circulation. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of endogenous CD34 + cells mobilization and exogenous ADMSCs administration in the treatment of a rat model of adriamycin (ADR)-induced CKD. A total of 48 male albino rats of the local strain (200 ± 50 g) were equally divided into four groups: control negative, ADR (control positive), ADMSCs group, and G-CSF group. Six rats from each group were sacrificed after 4 weeks and the other 6 after 12 weeks. Renal function was assessed frequently by measuring serum creatinine, albumin, urea, 24-h urinary protein level, and hemoglobin level throughout the study. Oxidative stress markers malondialdehyde (MDA) and total antioxidant (TAO) were measured on day 28. CD-34 + cell percentage was measured on day 9. After the sacrification of the rats, kidneys were removed for histopathological assessment. Results revealed that both ADMSCs and G-CSF significantly improved serum creatinine, albumin, urea, 24-h urinary protein level, and histopathological damage score,

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AlbuminsAnimalsBone Marrow CellsCreatinineDisease Models, AnimalDoxorubicinGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHematopoietic Stem CellsMale

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research