Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMedOpen access

Canine and feline mesenchymal stem cells: an integrative review of direct comparative studies by species and tissue source.

Kim HS., Shin TH.

Narrative Review on Immune Modulation, published in J Vet Sci (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Vet Sci (2025)
Country
Korea (South)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41331998
PMCID
PMC12703926
DOI
10.4142/jvs.25163

Abstract (original English)

Importance Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) play a pivotal role in advancing veterinary regenerative medicine in dogs and cats and serve as valuable preclinical models for human therapies. Despite their widespread application, fundamental knowledge gaps and the absence of standardized criteria for canine and feline MSCs remain. This review focuses exclusively on direct comparative studies across species and tissue sources to support evidence-based practices in which clinical use often precedes full scientific validation. Observations This review consolidates available comparative studies of canine and feline MSCs, categorizing them by species, tissue origin, and donor factors. We systematically assessed fundamental biological properties of MSCs (yield, morphology, proliferation, differentiation) and functionalities (immunomodulation, angiogenesis, migration). Overall, MSCs from both species exhibit properties comparable to those of human MSCs. However, canine MSCs have been more extensively studied across diverse tissues, whereas feline MSC research remains primarily restricted to adipose tissue and bone marrow. Notable interspecies and tissue-specific differences include proliferation rate, chondrogenic potential, and surface marker variability. Donor factors such as age also influence MSC behavior. Nevertheless, inconsistencies in sampling sites, culture protocols, and surface m

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsDogsMesenchymal Stem CellsCatsSpecies SpecificityCell Differentiation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research