Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsRandomized Controlled TrialPubMedOpen access

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging used for Evaluation of Adipose-Derived Stromal Cell Therapy in Patients with Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease.

Qayyum AA., Mathiasen AB., Mygind ND., Vejlstrup NG., Kastrup J.

Randomized Controlled Trial with a reported sample of 60 on Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke Research, Scar, published in Cell Transplant (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal
Cell Transplant (2019)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
60
Source database
PubMed
PMID
31698917
PMCID
PMC6923551
DOI
10.1177/0963689719883592
Citations
7

Abstract (original English)

Adipose-derived stromal cell (ASC) therapy is currently investigated as a new treatment option for patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ASC therapy in patients with chronic IHD measuring myocardial perfusion and cardiac function using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI). Patients were included in MyStromalCell trial, a phase II, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study investigated the effect of ASCs in patients with chronic IHD with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). In total, 41 of 60 patients underwent cine, late enhancement, rest and stress imaging with CMRI. There was a non-significant difference between stress and rest values in maximal signal intensity, a measure of myocardial perfusion, from baseline to follow-up comparing placebo with ASC group (-52.52 ± 88.61 and 3.05 ± 63.17, p = 0.061, respectively). LVEF, myocardial mass, stroke volume, left ventricle end-diastolic volume and end-systolic volume changed non-significantly (-0.5 ± 4.7%, -3.5 ± 13.1 g, -0.7 ± 8.6 mL, 1.9 ± 25.1 mL and 2.6 ± 16.5 mL, respectively) in the placebo group and in the ASC group (0.7 ± 8.6%, 0.9 ± 10.8 g, -0.3 ± 26.1 mL, -3.0 ± 31.5 mL and -2.7 ± 20.4 mL, respectively) from baseline to 6 months follow-up. The amount of scar tissue was unchanged in the placebo group by 0.0 ± 1.6 g, p = 1.0 and in the

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal Stem CellsMiddle Aged

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research