Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMedOpen access

Cardiac Progenitor Cells and Adipocyte Stem Cells from Same Patients Exhibit In Vitro Functional Differences.

Yee-Goh AS., Yamauchi A., van Hout I., Bellae Papannarao J., Sugunesegran R., Parry D.

Prospective Study on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Int J Mol Sci (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Int J Mol Sci (2022)
Country
Switzerland
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
35628402
PMCID
PMC9141982
DOI
10.3390/ijms23105588
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) and adipocyte stem cells (ASCs) are widely tested for their efficacy in repairing the diseased heart with varying results. However, no study has directly compared the functional efficacy of CPCs and ASCs collected from the same patient. CPCs and ASCs were isolated from the right atrial appendage and epicardial adipose tissue of the same patients, using explant culture. The flow cytometry analysis confirmed that both the cell types express common mesenchymal stem cells markers CD90 and CD105. ASCs, in addition, expressed CD29 and CD73. The wound-healing assay demonstrated that CPCs migrate faster to cover the wound area. Both cell types were resistant to hypoxia-induced cell death when exposed to hypoxia and serum deprivation; however, the ASCs showed increased proliferation. Conditioned medium (CM) collected after culturing serum-deprived CPCs and ASCs showed differential secretion patterns, with ASC CM showing an increased IGF-1 level, while CPC CM showed an increased FGF level. Only CPC CM reduced hypoxia-induced apoptosis in AC-16 human ventricular cardiomyocytes, while vascular network formation by endothelial cells was comparable between CPC and ASC CM. In conclusion, ASCs and CPCs exhibit differential characteristics within the same patient, and in vitro studies showed that CPCs have marginally superior functional efficacy.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
AdipocytesAdipose TissueCulture Media, ConditionedEndothelial CellsHumansHypoxiaStem Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research