Cardiac tissue-derived extracellular matrix scaffolds for myocardial repair: advantages and challenges
Kc P., Hong Y., Zhang G.
Narrative Review on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Regen Biomater (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Regen Biomater (2019)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 31404421
- PMCID
- PMC6683951
- DOI
- 10.1093/rb/rbz017
- Citations
- 71
Abstract (original English)
Decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) derived from myocardium has been widely explored as a nature scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering applications. Cardiac dECM offers many unique advantages such as preservation of organ-specific ECM microstructure and composition, demonstration of tissue-mimetic mechanical properties and retention of biochemical cues in favor of subsequent recellularization. However, current processes of dECM decellularization and recellularization still face many challenges including the need for balance between cell removal and extracellular matrix preservation, efficient recellularization of dECM for obtaining homogenous cell distribution, tailoring material properties of dECM for enhancing bioactivity and prevascularization of thick dECM. This review summarizes the recent progresses of using dECM scaffold for cardiac repair and discusses its major advantages and challenges for producing biomimetic cardiac patch.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Factor XII-A New Therapeutic Target? A Systematic Review
Systematic Review on Cardiovascular Disease, Neuroinflammation, published in Int J Mol Sci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Int J Mol Sci1 citations - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Can cell-based therapies bridge the gap between research and reality in the treatment of myocarditis? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Regen Ther (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Regen Ther - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for myocardial infarction and heart failure: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 3345 on Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke Research, published in Syst Rev (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 3345
Syst Rev - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Orally derived mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of vascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Sci Rep (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Sci Rep - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
From Preservation to Repair: A Systematic Review of Therapeutic Organ Rehabilitation During Normothermic Ex Vivo Machine Perfusion
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 12 on Cardiovascular Disease, Immune Modulation, published in Transplant Direct (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 12
Transplant Direct - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Safety and Efficacy of Transendocardial Stem Cells Therapy in Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Meta-analysis on Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke Research, published in Curr Cardiol Rev (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Curr Cardiol Rev