Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyEurope PMCOpen access

CD206+ macrophages facilitate wound healing through interactions with Gpnmb hi fibroblasts

Honda A., Koike H., Dohi T., Toyohara E., Hayakawa S., Tobe K.

Animal Study on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in EMBO Rep (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
EMBO Rep (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40495034
PMCID
PMC12287335
DOI
10.1038/s44319-025-00496-4
Citations
10

Abstract (original English)

Wound healing is a multifaceted and dynamic sequence of tissue repair and regeneration processes involving interrelated stages: inflammation, regeneration, and remodeling. Throughout these processes, macrophages change their phenotypes and interact with cells and extracellular components to facilitate healing. In particular, macrophages expressing the surface marker CD206 associate with inflammation resolution and tissue repair. However, how CD206 + macrophages contribute to these processes is insufficiently understood. Here, using a mouse model of CD206 + macrophage depletion and single-cell transcriptomics, we report that selective depletion of CD206 + macrophages results in modest but significant delays in wound healing, prolongs inflammation, and significantly reduces the number of Gpnmb hi fibroblasts in injured skin. Single-cell data suggest that CD206 + macrophages communicate with Gpnmb hi fibroblasts via multiple pathways. Notably, topical administration of PDGF-AA to wounds of CD206 + macrophage-depleted mice restores healing processes, identifying PDGF-A signaling from CD206 + macrophages to PDGFRA on fibroblasts as an important mechanism promoting wound healing. Collectively, these data demonstrate that CD206 + macrophages communicate with Gpnmb hi fibroblasts to activate their proliferation and extracellular matrix deposition in wound healing.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
FibroblastsMacrophagesSkinAnimalsMice, Inbred C57BLMiceInflammationEye ProteinsMembrane GlycoproteinsLectins, C-Type

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research