Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Cell-assisted lipotransfer: Current concepts.

Laloze J., Varin A., Bertheuil N., Grolleau JL., Vaysse C., Chaput B.

Narrative Review on Facial Rejuvenation, published in Ann Chir Plast Esthet (2017) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Ann Chir Plast Esthet (2017)
Country
France
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
28457726
DOI
10.1016/j.anplas.2017.03.011
Citations
29

Abstract (original English)

Autologous fat transfer, or lipofilling, is a common technique used for soft tissue reconstruction. It has been used for many years, but the technique is associated with a significant graft resorption rate (20% to 80%). To improve the fat graft survival rate, several methods have been tested, and one has appeared more promising: cell-assisted lipotransfer (CAL). In the CAL method, fat is enriched with adipose-derived stromal cells (ASC), contained in the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) obtained after enzymatic digestion of fat or after cell culture to improve the fat survival rate. In this concise review, we present the clinical indications, and the technical principles of CAL, as well as a presentation of ASC. To conclude, we present the main results (efficacy, complications and safety) obtained from different studies of this technique.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AdipocytesAdipose TissueAutograftsCell DifferentiationGraft SurvivalHumansLipectomyPlastic Surgery ProceduresStromal CellsSurgery, Plastic

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research