Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Characterizing Direct-to-Consumer Stem Cell Businesses in the Southwest United States.

Frow EK., Brafman DA., Muldoon A., Krum L., Williams P., Becker B.

Laboratory Study on Autoimmune Research, published in Stem Cell Reports (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Stem Cell Reports (2019)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
31378670
DOI
10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.07.001

Abstract (original English)

There are currently hundreds of businesses across the United States offering direct-to-consumer stem cell treatments that have not been through regulatory approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Here, we provide a detailed characterization of nearly 170 stem cell businesses operating in the Southwest United States. We draw specific attention to two as-yet understudied facets of these businesses. First, we identify differences in the degree to which a given business focuses their practice on stem cell treatments. Second, we compare the stated expertise of the care providers in stem cell businesses with the range of conditions they purport to treat. These findings deepen our knowledge of the growing industry around unapproved stem cell treatments, and are used here to offer suggestions for how the FDA might target its resources with respect to regulatory oversight.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAutoimmune DiseasesBone Marrow CellsHumansModels, EconomicMusculoskeletal DiseasesStem Cell TransplantationStem CellsUnited States

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research