Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Chronic Diabetic Wounds and Their Treatment with Skin Substitutes

Holl J., Kowalewski C., Zimek Z., Fiedor P., Kaminski A., Oldak T.

Narrative Review on Type 2 Diabetes, Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, published in Cells (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Cells (2021)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
33804192
PMCID
PMC8001234
DOI
10.3390/cells10030655
Citations
247

Abstract (original English)

With the global prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus steeply rising, instances of chronic, hard-healing, or non-healing diabetic wounds and ulcers are predicted to increase. The growing understanding of healing and regenerative mechanisms has elucidated critical regulators of this process, including key cellular and humoral components. Despite this, the management and successful treatment of diabetic wounds represents a significant therapeutic challenge. To this end, the development of novel therapies and biological dressings has gained increased interest. Here we review key differences between normal and chronic non-healing diabetic wounds, and elaborate on recent advances in wound healing treatments with a particular focus on biological dressings and their effect on key wound healing pathways.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansDiabetic FootDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Wounds and InjuriesChronic DiseaseSkin, ArtificialWound Healing

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research