Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Comparative analysis and characterization of soluble factors and exosomes from cultured adipose tissue and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in canine species.

Villatoro AJ., Alcoholado C., Martín-Astorga MC., Fernández V., Cifuentes M., Becerra J.

Animal Study on Immune Modulation, published in Vet Immunol Immunopathol (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Vet Immunol Immunopathol (2018)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
30712794
DOI
10.1016/j.vetimm.2018.12.003

Abstract (original English)

The two main sources of mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs) in the canine species are bone marrow (cBM-MSCs) and adipose tissue (cAd-MSCs). The secretion of multitude bioactive molecules, included under the concept of secretome and found in the cultured medium, play a predominant role in the mechanism of action of these cells on tissue regeneration. Although certain features of its characterization are well documented, their secretory profiles remain unknown. We described and compared, for the first time, the secretory profile and exosomes characterization in standard monolayer culture of MSCs from both sources of the same donor as well as its immunomodulatory potential. We found that despite the similarity in surface immunophenotyping and trilineage differentiation, there are several differences in terms of proliferation rate and secretory profile. cAd-MSCs have advantages in proliferative capacity, whereas cBM-MSCs showed a significantly higher secretory production of some soluble factors (IL-10, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12p40, IFN-γ, VEGF-A, NGF-β, TGF-β, NO and PGE2) and exosomes under the same standard culture conditions. Proteomics analysis confirm that cBM-MSCs exosomes have a greater number of characterized proteins involved in metabolic processes and in the regulation of biological processes compared to cAd-MSCs. On the other hand, secretome from both sources demonstrate similar

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsBone Marrow CellsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCytokinesDogsExosomesFemale

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research