Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Comparative analysis of stemness between dermal papilla cells and human dermal stem/progenitor cells.

Shim JH.

Laboratory Study on Hair Regeneration, published in Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) (2025)
Country
France
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
40285785
DOI
10.14715/cmb/2025.71.4.6

Abstract (original English)

Adult stem cells (ASCs) have great applicative potential in tissue regeneration. Comparative analyses of ASCs derived from various niches are essential for comprehending the unique traits of each population and evaluating their potential for therapeutic use. In this study, the proliferation ability, stem cell marker expressions, and differentiation potential of skin-derived ASCs were compared between hair follicle dermal papilla cells (HFDPCs) and human dermal stem/progenitor cells (hDSPCs). The cell division capacity of hDSPCs was significantly increased compared with HFDPCs, and the differentiation capacity into adipocytes, chondrocytes, and osteoblasts was significantly increased in hDSPCs. On the contrary, HFDPCs showed significantly increased expression of dermal papilla-related markers (SOX2, S100β, CORIN and Snai2) compared with hDSPCs. To analyze why these two types of ASCs have different properties, I analyzed intracellular signaling by protein kinase assay. Protein kinase assays showed that the phosphorylation of ERK1/2, c-JUN, CREB, YES, and GSK3α/β is significantly changed in HFDPCs and hDSPCs compared with dermal fibroblasts. HFDPCs have increased expression of markers related to hair regeneration compared with hDSPCs, on the other hand, hDSPCs are more multipotent than HFDPCs. The five above-mentioned phosphorylated signaling proteins (ERK1/2, c-JUN, CREB, YES, an

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansHair FollicleDermisCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationStem CellsCells, CulturedBiomarkersAdultAdult Stem Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research