Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Comparative Biological Effects of Human Amnion and Chorion Membrane Extracts on Human Adipose-Derived Stromal Cells.

Namgoong S., Lee H., Lee JS., Jeong SH., Han SK., Dhong ES.

Laboratory Study on Chronic Wound, published in J Craniofac Surg (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
J Craniofac Surg (2019)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
30817541
DOI
10.1097/SCS.0000000000005393

Abstract (original English)

Although therapies with human amnion/chorion are used to ameliorate acute and chronic wounds, it is unclear which component of the amnion/chorion tissue promotes wound healing. To characterize the comparative effects of amnion and chorion in wound healing, we used human adipose-derived stromal cells to assess cell viability, migration, and gel contraction after treatment with amnion membrane extract (AME) or chorion membrane extract (CME). We then correlated the possible effectors via AME and CME protein profiling, and compared them by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), western blotting, and immunocytochemistry. Cell viability was significantly increased with 50 and 100 μg/mL AME treatment, but with CME treatment, a significant increase was only observed with 100 μg/mL. With CME treatment, cell migration was 2.22-fold greater than the control, and collagen gels showed 20% greater contraction. Compared to control, the expression levels of α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) and smooth muscle protein 22-alpha (SM22α) increased both with AME and CME treatments, whereas calponin expression decreased. Protein profiling revealed significantly higher tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1), interleukin-8, exotoxin, and adiponectin levels in CME than in AME, and ELISA revealed 8-fold higher adiponectin levels in cells treated with CME than those treated with AME. Immunocytoche

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
ActinsAdipose TissueAmnionCalcium-Binding ProteinsCell MovementCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCells, CulturedChorionHumans

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research