Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Comparative Regenerative Efficacy of PRP Combined with Chondrocytes or Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Intervertebral Disc Regeneration in a Rabbit Model

Reyes-Fernandez PM., Romero-Díaz VJ., Juárez JG., Vílchez-Cavazos JF., Acosta-Olivo CA., Peña-Martínez VM.

Animal Study on Back Pain, Disc Degeneration, published in Int J Mol Sci (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Int J Mol Sci (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41155302
PMCID
PMC12562871
DOI
10.3390/ijms262010007
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Intervertebral disc degeneration is a leading cause of chronic back pain, with existing treatments focusing on symptom management rather than true tissue repair. Cellular therapies-such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP), autologous chondrocytes, and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)-have emerged as promising strategies for disc regeneration. In this study, fifteen New Zealand white rabbits underwent fluoroscopy-guided needle puncture of the L4-L5 discs and were allocated to receive PRP alone, PRP-chondrocytes, or PRP-MSCs eight weeks later, while the L3-L4 disc served as a healthy internal control. At 16 weeks post-injury, histological scoring revealed significant improvements in annular integrity, cellularity, and matrix composition in all treated groups compared with untreated lesions, with the greatest gains observed in the PRP-chondrocytes arm, intermediate effects with PRP-MSCs, and more modest changes with PRP alone. Complementary RT-qPCR analysis of COL2A1 and COL10A1 expression confirmed a shift toward a more regenerative phenotype, marked by enhanced COL2A1 and reduced COL10A1 levels, which was most pronounced in the PRP-chondrocytes arm. Despite these advances, none of the interventions fully restored the healthy disc architecture, underscoring the complexity of disc repair. These findings support the potential of combining PRP with chondrocytes or MSCs for intervertebral dis

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
ChondrocytesMesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsRabbitsDisease Models, AnimalMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationRegenerationMalePlatelet-Rich PlasmaIntervertebral Disc

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research