Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Comparison effect of collagen/P3HB composite scaffold and human amniotic membrane loaded with mesenchymal stem cells on colon anastomosis healing in male rats.

Zamani M., Zahedian A., Tanideh N., Khodabandeh Z., Koohpeyma F., Khazraei H.

Animal Study on Chronic Wound, published in Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2023)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
37832385
DOI
10.1016/j.bbrc.2023.10.020

Abstract (original English)

Covering surgical wounds with biomaterials, biologic scaffolds, and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) improves the healing process and reduces postoperative complications. This study was designed to evaluate and compare the effect of MSC-free/MSC-seeded new collagen/poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (COL/P3HB) composite scaffold and human amniotic membrane (HAM) on the colon anastomosis healing process. COL/P3HB scaffold was prepared using freeze-drying method. MSCs were isolated and characterized from rat adipose tissue. After biocompatibility evaluation by MTT assay, MSCs were seeded on the scaffold and HAM by micro-mass seeding technique. In total, 35 male rats were randomly divided into five groups. After the surgical procedure, cecum incisions were covered by the MSC-free/MSC-seeded scaffold or HAM. Incisions in the control group were only sutured. One month later, the healing process was determined by stereological analysis. The Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn's tests were utilized for statistical outcome analysis (SPSS software version 21). COL/10% P3HB scaffold showed the best mechanical and structural properties (7.86 MPa strength, porosity more than 75%). MTT assay indicated that scaffold and especially HAM have suitable biocompatibility. Collagenization and neovascularization were significantly higher, and necrosis was considerably lower in all treated groups in comparison with th

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansRatsMaleAnimalsTissue ScaffoldsAmnionWound HealingCollagenMesenchymal Stem CellsAnastomosis, Surgical

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research