Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Comparison of skeletal muscle decellularization protocols and recellularization with adipose-derived stem cells for tissue engineering.

Esposito J., Cunha PDS., Martins TMDM., Melo MIA., Sá MA., Gomes DA.

Animal Study on Immune Modulation, published in Biologicals (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Biologicals (2024)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
38704951
PMCID
PMC11166402
DOI
10.1016/j.biologicals.2024.101767
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Decellularization is a novel technique employed for scaffold manufacturing, as a strategy for skeletal muscle (SM) tissue engineering applications. However, poor decellularization efficacy is still a problem for the use of decellularized scaffolds as truly biocompatible biomaterials. For recellularization, adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) are a good option, due to their immunomodulatory and pro-regenerative capacity, but few studies have described their combination with muscle-decellularized matrices (mDMs). This work aimed to evaluate the efficiency of four multi-step decellularization protocols to produce mDMs and to investigate in vitro biocompatibility with ASCs. Here, we described the different efficacies of muscle decellularization methods, suggesting the need for stricter standardization of the method, considering the large range of applications in SM tissue engineering, which is also a promising platform for preclinical studies with rat disease models using autologous cells.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Tissue EngineeringAnimalsMuscle, SkeletalAdipose TissueTissue ScaffoldsRatsStem CellsDecellularized Extracellular MatrixHumansCells, Cultured

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research