Composite Zonal Scaffolds of Collagen I/II for Meniscus Regeneration.
González-Duque MI., Flórez AM., Torres MA., Fontanilla MR.
Laboratory Study on Meniscus Injury, published in ACS Biomater Sci Eng (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- ACS Biomater Sci Eng (2024)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 38549452
- DOI
- 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01737
- Citations
- 4
Abstract (original English)
The meniscus is divided into three zones according to its vascularity: an external vascularized red-red zone mainly comprising collagen I, a red-white interphase zone mainly comprising collagens I and II, and an internal white-white zone rich in collagen II. Known scaffolds used to treat meniscal injuries do not reflect the chemical composition of the vascular areas of the meniscus. Therefore, in this study, four composite zonal scaffolds (named A, B, C, and D) were developed and characterized; the developed scaffolds exhibited the main chemical components of the external (collagen I), interphase (collagens I/II), and internal (collagen II) zones of the meniscus. Noncomposite scaffolds were also produced (named E), which had the same shape as the composite scaffolds but were entirely made of collagen I. The composite zonal scaffolds were prepared using different concentrations of collagen I and the same concentration of collagen II and were either cross-linked with genipin or not cross-linked. Porous, biodegradable, and hydrophilic scaffolds with an expected chemical composition were obtained. Their pore size was smaller than the size reported for the meniscus substitutes; however, all scaffolds allowed the adhesion and proliferation of human adipose-derived stem cells (hADSCs) and were not cytotoxic. Data from enzymatic degradation and hADSC proliferation assays were considere
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Optimizing Meniscus Allograft Transplantation - Reducing Extrusion and Restoring Joint Loading Mechanics: A Systematic Review
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Meniscus Injury, published in Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Emerging biologic augmentation strategies for meniscal repair: a systematic review
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 18 on Meniscus Injury, Chronic Wound, published in BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2024
- n = 18
BMC Musculoskelet Disord7 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Osteoarthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Contributing Factors and Potential Treatments
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Meniscus Injury, Ligament Injury, published in Cureus (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2024
Cureus1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Cell-based therapies have disease-modifying effects on osteoarthritis in animal models. A systematic review by the ESSKA Orthobiologic Initiative. Part 1: adipose tissue-derived cell-based injectable therapies.
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Meniscus Injury, published in Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2022
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc40 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Cell-based therapy in soft tissue sports injuries of the knee: a systematic review.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 9 on Osteoarthritis, Meniscus Injury, Tendon Injury, Ligament Injury, published in Expert Opin Biol Ther (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2021
- n = 9
Expert Opin Biol Ther10 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Stem cells application in meniscal tears: a systematic review of pre-clinical and clinical evidence.
Systematic Review on Meniscus Injury, published in Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2021
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci