Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Composite Zonal Scaffolds of Collagen I/II for Meniscus Regeneration.

González-Duque MI., Flórez AM., Torres MA., Fontanilla MR.

Laboratory Study on Meniscus Injury, published in ACS Biomater Sci Eng (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
ACS Biomater Sci Eng (2024)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
38549452
DOI
10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01737
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

The meniscus is divided into three zones according to its vascularity: an external vascularized red-red zone mainly comprising collagen I, a red-white interphase zone mainly comprising collagens I and II, and an internal white-white zone rich in collagen II. Known scaffolds used to treat meniscal injuries do not reflect the chemical composition of the vascular areas of the meniscus. Therefore, in this study, four composite zonal scaffolds (named A, B, C, and D) were developed and characterized; the developed scaffolds exhibited the main chemical components of the external (collagen I), interphase (collagens I/II), and internal (collagen II) zones of the meniscus. Noncomposite scaffolds were also produced (named E), which had the same shape as the composite scaffolds but were entirely made of collagen I. The composite zonal scaffolds were prepared using different concentrations of collagen I and the same concentration of collagen II and were either cross-linked with genipin or not cross-linked. Porous, biodegradable, and hydrophilic scaffolds with an expected chemical composition were obtained. Their pore size was smaller than the size reported for the meniscus substitutes; however, all scaffolds allowed the adhesion and proliferation of human adipose-derived stem cells (hADSCs) and were not cytotoxic. Data from enzymatic degradation and hADSC proliferation assays were considere

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansTissue ScaffoldsTissue EngineeringAggrecansMeniscusCollagen Type ICollagenRegeneration

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research