Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialEurope PMCOpen access

Concise Review: Rational Use of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Ischemic Heart Disease

Ward MR., Abadeh A., Connelly KA.

Clinical Trial on Cardiovascular Disease, Immune Modulation, published in Stem Cells Transl Med (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Stem Cells Transl Med (2018)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
29665255
PMCID
PMC6052612
DOI
10.1002/sctm.17-0210
Citations
69

Abstract (original English)

The capacity of stem and progenitor cells to stimulate cardiac regeneration has been studied for almost 20 years, with very promising preclinical data and mixed clinical results. Several cell types have been studied, identified by their cell surface markers, differentiation capacity and their secreted growth factors. Bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been found to have potent regenerative capacity, through multiple mechanisms, including mesoderm lineage differentiation, immunomodulation, and paracrine stimulation. MSCs also secrete exosomes and microvesicles, which themselves contain potent angiogenic cytokines or mRNA molecules with effects on their local milieu. This concise review summarizes the mechanisms of MSC-based cardiac regeneration and highlighting results from molecular and preclinical studies. We also discuss clinical trial results to date, and ongoing studies. Furthermore, we discuss novel approaches for the enhancement of MSC based cardiac regeneration, such as genetic modification. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2018;7:543-550.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
Mesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsHumansMyocardial IschemiaMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationParacrine CommunicationCell DifferentiationClinical Trials as TopicExosomesExtracellular Vesicles

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research