Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Critical Appraisal of Pharmaceutical Therapy in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy-Challenges and Prospectives

Khattab E., Kyriakou M., Leonidou E., Sokratous S., Mouzarou A., Myrianthefs MM.

Narrative Review on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Pharmaceuticals (Basel) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Pharmaceuticals (Basel) (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39861195
PMCID
PMC11768626
DOI
10.3390/ph18010134
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a multifaceted disorder with a pandemic spread and a remarkable burden of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DBCM) has been increasingly recognized as the development of cardiac dysfunction, which is accompanied by heart failure (HF) symptoms in the absence of obvious reasons like ischemic heart disease, hypertension, or valvulopathies. Several pathophysiological mechanisms have been proposed, including metabolic disorders (e.g., glycation products), oxidative stress, low-grade inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, etc., which should guide the development of new therapeutic strategies. Up to now, HF treatment has not differed between patients with and without diabetes, which limits the expected benefits despite the high cardiovascular risk in the former group. However, DBCM patients may require different management, which prioritize anti-diabetic medications or testing other novel therapies. This review aims to appraise the challenges and prospectives of the individualized pharmaceutical therapy for DBCM.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research