The Current State of Fat Grafting in the Hand: A Systematic Review for Hand Diseases.

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Autologous fat grafting (AFG) has traditionally been used for facial rejuvenation and soft tissue augmentation, but in recent years, its use has expanded to treat diseases of the hand. Autologous fat grafting is ideal for use in the hand because it is minimally invasive, can restore volume, and has regenerative capabilities. This review summarizes the emerging evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of AFG to the hand in several conditions, including systemic sclerosis, Dupuytren disease, osteoarthritis, burns, and traumatic fingertip injuries. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant literature search on the use of AFG in hand pathologies was performed on October 8, 2020, in Ovid MEDLINE, Elsevier Embase, Clarivate Web of Science, and Wiley Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The retrieved hits were screened and reviewed by 2 independent reviewers and a third reviewer adjudicated when required. Reviewers identified 919 unique hits. Screening of the abstracts identified 22 manuscripts which described the use of AFG to treat an identified hand condition. Studies suggest AFG in the hands is a safe, noninvasive option for the management of systemic sclerosis, Dupuytren contracture, osteoarthritis, burns, and traumatic fingertip injuries. While AFG is a promising therapeutic option for autoimmune, inflammatory, and fibrotic disea

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.