Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

[Current status and prospects of clinical application of liposuction].

Cao H., Liu H.

Narrative Review on Burns, published in Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi (2022)
Country
China
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
35038811
DOI
10.7507/1002-1892.202108077

Abstract (original English)

To review the characteristics and deficiencies of various liposuction methods to provide reference for choosing more suitable liposuction in clinic and ideas for the improvement and development of liposuction equipment. The literature related to liposuction in recent years was consulted, and the principle, indications as well as existing problems were reviewed. Liposuction can be divided into two categories according to the principles of fat separation. The first type relies on physical cutting to separate fat, including suction-assisted liposuction (SAL), power-assisted liposuction (PAL), and water-assisted liposuction (WAL). SAL and PAL are simple to operate and low in price, but the effect of liposuction mainly depends on the experience of the surgeon, and complications such as uneven appearance, hematoma, and ecchymosis may occur. WAL saves time and effort, but has lower cost performance. The second type relies on energy destruction to separate fat, including ultrasound-assisted liposuction, laser-assisted liposuction, and radiofrequency-assisted liposuction. This type of surgery has the advantages of less trauma, fast postoperative recovery, and skin tightening. However, the equipment is more expensive, and has a risk of skin burns. Liposuction can effectively reduce local fat accumulation, but it still has limitations. Equipment improvement and fat transplantation are imp

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansLipectomySkin

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research