Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Current treatment of rectovaginal fistula in Crohn's disease

Zhu YF., Tao GQ., Zhou N., Xiang C.

Narrative Review on Chronic Wound, Autoimmune Research, published in World J Gastroenterol (2011) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
World J Gastroenterol (2011)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
21448347
PMCID
PMC3057157
DOI
10.3748/wjg.v17.i8.963
Citations
27

Abstract (original English)

Rectovaginal fistula (RVF) continues to be the most difficult perianal manifestation of Crohn's disease to treat. This devastating and disabling complication has a significant impact on patients' quality of life and presents unique management challenges. Current therapeutic approaches include many medical therapeutics and surgical treatments with a wide range of success rates reported. However, current evidence is lacking to support any recommendation. The choice of repair depends on various patient and disease factors and basic surgical tenets. In this article, we review the current options to consider in the treatment of Crohn's-related RVF, and try to evaluate their effects on fistulae closure and quality of life.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansRectovaginal FistulaCrohn DiseaseWound HealingQuality of LifeFemaleClinical Trials as Topic

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research