Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Current wound healing procedures and potential care

Dreifke MB., Jayasuriya AA., Jayasuriya AC.

Narrative Review on Chronic Wound, published in Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl (2015) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl (2015)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
25579968
PMCID
PMC4443476
DOI
10.1016/j.msec.2014.12.068
Citations
283

Abstract (original English)

In this review, we describe current and future potential wound healing treatments for acute and chronic wounds. The current wound healing approaches are based on autografts, allografts, and cultured epithelial autografts, and wound dressings based on biocompatible and biodegradable polymers. The Food and Drug Administration approved wound healing dressings based on several polymers including collagen, silicon, chitosan, and hyaluronic acid. The new potential therapeutic intervention for wound healing includes sustained delivery of growth factors, and siRNA delivery, targeting microRNA, and stem cell therapy. In addition, environment sensors can also potentially utilize to monitor and manage microenvironment at wound site. Sensors use optical, odor, pH, and hydration sensors to detect such characteristics as uric acid level, pH, protease level, and infection - all in the hopes of early detection of complications.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansWounds and InjuriesAcute DiseaseChronic DiseaseSiliconChitosanCollagenHyaluronic AcidIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMicroRNAs

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research