Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMedOpen access

Decellularized adipose-derived matrix from Superficial layers of abdominal adipose tissue exhibits superior capacity of adipogenesis compared to deep layers.

Ma X., Yue Q., Fu S., Liu C., Luan J.

Animal Study on Hip, published in Mater Today Bio (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Mater Today Bio (2024)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
39318374
PMCID
PMC11421347
DOI
10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101235
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

The adipogenic property of decellularized adipose-derived matrix (DAM) varies widely across reports, making it difficult to make a horizontal comparison between reports and posing challenges for the stable clinical translation of DAM. It is possibly due to differences in donor characteristics, but the exact relationship remains unclear. Despite extensive research on the differences between superficial and deep layers of abdominal subcutaneous fat, a main donor of DAM, little is known about their extracellular matrix (ECM) which is promising in regenerative medicine. In this study, we first confirmed the distinct compositional profiles and adipogenic potential between superficial and deep DAM (S-DAM and D-DAM). Both in vitro and in vivo assays confirmed superior adipogenic induction potential in S-DAM over D-DAM. Total amounts of ECM proteins like collagen and laminin were similar, however, the predominant types differed, with collagen I dominating S-DAM and collagen XIV prevailing in D-DAM. S-DAM was enriched with mitochondrial and immunological proteins, whereas D-DAM featured more neuronal, vascular, muscular, and endocrine-related proteins. More proteins involved in mRNA processing were found in D-DAM, with Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) analysis revealing HNRNPA2B1, HNRNPA1, and HNRNPC as the most tightly interacting members. These findings not only deepen our comprehens

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research