Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

[Differences between adipose-derived stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells in differentiation into cardiomyocytes].

Zhang DZ., Gai LY., Liu HW.

Animal Study on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Sheng Li Xue Bao (2008) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Sheng Li Xue Bao (2008)
Country
China
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
18560724
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) are similar to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in growth kinetics, antigen expression and multi-lineage differentiation capacity. The present study was designed to investigate the differences between ASCs and MSCs in in vitro culture and differentiation into cardiomyocytes. ASCs were isolated from the fat tissue of New Zealand white rabbits while MSCs were obtained from rat bone marrow. Both ASCs and MSCs were cultured in Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum in the same incubator and treated with various concentrations of 5-azacytidine. A clonogenic assay was used to quantify ASCs in fat tissue and MSCs in bone marrow. The number of ASCs in the fat tissue was much higher than that of MSCs in the bone marrow quantified by clonogenic assay, and MSCs showed a remarkably slower proliferative rate compared with ASCs, especially at primary passage. ASCs began to attach to the bottom of the culture flask 12 h after seeding. The cells in culture assumed a short spindle shape under a phase-contrast microscope and did not form clusters. The phenotype was maintained through repeated subcultures under nonstimulating conditions. No other cell phenotype was observed. MSCs attached to the culture flask at 24-48 h after seeding and grew in clusters. The cells were fibroblast-like and prone to senescence or diff

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsAzacitidineBone Marrow CellsCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationMesenchymal Stem CellsMyocytes, CardiacRabbitsRats

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research