Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Differential Secretomes of Processed Adipose Grafts, the Stromal Vascular Fraction, and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.

Carr H., Asaad M., Wu Y., Branch-Brooks C., Zhang Q., Hematti P.

Laboratory Study on Chronic Wound, Facial Rejuvenation, published in Stem Cells Dev (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Stem Cells Dev (2024)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
39030836
PMCID
PMC12976705
DOI
10.1089/scd.2024.0071
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

There are multiple methods to prepare lipoaspirate for autologous fat transfer; however, graft retention remains unpredictable. The purpose of this study was to compare the cellular and protein composition of adipose grafts and the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) resulting from three common techniques to prepare adipose grafts. Adipose grafts were harvested from healthy donors and processed via three techniques: centrifugation (C), a single-filter (SF) device, and a double-filtration (DF) system. Part of each graft was analyzed or further processed to isolate the SVF. Cell viability, surface markers, cytokine, and growth factors were compared between the graft and SVF as well as adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs). Overall, we found variations across the three processing techniques and among the graft components (ASCs, SVF, and fat). Cell viability within the grafts was similar (94.6%, 92.3%, and 93.6%; P = 0.93). The trend was a greater percentage of ASCs from SF versus DF or centrifugation (6.95%, 4.63%, and 1.93%, respectively, P = 0.06). Adipogenic markers (adiponectin and leptin) were similar among all three grafts ( P = 0.45). Markers of tissue remodeling were greatest in the SVF compared with fat and ASCs, regardless of processing technique. There was higher relative expression of MMP-9 (2×), Extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (EMMPRIN) (2.5×), endoglin (5×), a

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansAdipose TissueStromal Vascular FractionFemaleAdultCell SurvivalSecretomeStem CellsMiddle AgedCytokines

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research