Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Direct comparison of the potency of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from amnion tissue, bone marrow and adipose tissue at inducing dermal fibroblast responses to cutaneous wounds.

Liu X., Wang Z., Wang R., Zhao F., Shi P., Jiang Y.

Animal Study on Chronic Wound, published in Int J Mol Med (2012) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Int J Mol Med (2012)
Country
Greece
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
23228965
DOI
10.3892/ijmm.2012.1199

Abstract (original English)

Although transplantation of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from amnion (hAMSCs), bone marrow (hBMSCs) and adipose tissues (hADSCs) has been shown to aid in the repair of cutaneous wounds in mouse models, little information is available regarding the relative efficacy of MSCs from different sources. In this study, we compared their therapeutic potentials by transplanting equal numbers of hAMSCs, hBMSCs or hADSCs in a mouse model of cutaneous wounds. The results suggested that an hADSC injection has the most pronounced effect on wound closure. Histological evaluation showed enhanced re-epithelialization in the hADSC group compared with the hBMSC and hAMSC groups. Although there was a slight improvement in wound healing in the hAMSC and hBMSC groups, the differences between the groups were statistically insignificant. In a trans-well coculture model, wound healing migration and transwell migration assays showed that hADSCs were superior to hAMSCs and hBMSCs at promoting human dermal fibroblast (hDF) migration. However, there was no significant difference in fibroblast proliferation between the hAMSC, hBMSC and hADSC groups, as measured by WST assay. Our results also indicated that hDFs cocultured with hADSCs for 48 h significantly upregulated their mRNA expression of the cytokine vascular endothelial growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, keratinocyte growth f

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAmnionAnimalsBone Marrow CellsCell MovementCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCytokinesFemaleFibroblasts

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research