Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Dynamic Histone Modification Patterns in Key Transcription Factor Genes During Porcine Adipogenesis

Aksoy MO., Wozniak J., Stachowiak M., Szczerbal I.

Animal Study on Hip, published in Genes (Basel) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Genes (Basel) (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42194978
PMCID
PMC13205497
DOI
10.3390/genes17050521

Abstract (original English)

Background Adipogenesis is governed by a complex interplay between transcriptional regulation and epigenetic remodeling. While many transcriptional pathways have been well characterized, less is known about how chromatin-level regulation shapes the timing of gene expression, particularly in large animal models such as pigs. In this study, we investigated histone modification patterns associated with four key adipogenic transcription factor genes- PPARG , GATA2 , CEBPA , and CEBPB -in porcine mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) undergoing adipogenic differentiation. Methods Using RT-qPCR and ChIP-qPCR, we profiled gene transcription levels and epigenetic marks, including promoter- and exon-specific enrichment of the activating histone marks H3K9ac and H4K8ac, as well as the repressive mark H4K20me3, across six time points (day 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10). Results Although PPARG and GATA2 are located in close proximity on porcine chromosome 13, they exhibited distinct histone modification profiles. PPARG showed progressive promoter acetylation (H4K8ac) accompanied by transcriptional activation, whereas GATA2 displayed decreased exon acetylation (H3K9ac) associated with declining expression. In contrast, the H4K20me3 profile was similar for both genes, suggesting no direct association with their transcriptional activity. Interestingly, CEBPA (chromosome 6) and CEBPB (chromosome 17) exhibited

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Mesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsSwineHistonesTranscription FactorsCell DifferentiationGene Expression RegulationEpigenesis, GeneticHistone CodeAcetylation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research