Dynamic Seeding versus Microinjection of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Acellular Nerve Allograft Reconstructions.
Bedar M., Pulos NA., Shin AY.
Animal Study on Ankle Injury, published in Plast Reconstr Surg (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- Plast Reconstr Surg (2023)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 37537724
- PMCID
- PMC10838349
- DOI
- 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010970
- Citations
- 1
Abstract (original English)
Background Functional recovery after acellular nerve allograft (ANA) reconstruction remains inferior to that after autologous nerve grafting, but improved outcomes have been demonstrated with the addition of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Controversy exists regarding the optimal cell-delivery method to enhance ANA reconstructions. The authors investigated the functional recovery of ANAs after dynamic seeding versus microinjection of MSCs. Methods Forty Lewis rats underwent reconstruction of a 10-mm sciatic nerve defect. Animals were divided into 4 groups: reversed autograft, ANA alone, dynamically seeded ANA, or ANA injected with MSCs. During the survival period, ultrasound measurements of the tibialis anterior muscle cross-sectional area were performed. At 12 weeks, functional recovery was evaluated using measurements of ankle contracture, compound muscle action potential, maximum isometric tetanic force, muscle mass, histomorphometry, and immunofluorescence. Results The dynamic seeding and microinjection groups demonstrated higher cross-sectional tibialis anterior muscle area recovery than autografts and ANAs alone at week 8 and weeks 4 and 8, respectively. The ankle contracture and compound muscle action potential amplitude recovery were superior in autografts and both seeding methods compared with ANAs alone. The microinjection group demonstrated significant
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Cell-Based Therapies for Post-Traumatic Ankle Osteoarthritis and Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Scoping Review of an Emerging and Heterogeneous Evidence Base.
Systematic Review on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, Ankle Injury, published in Bioengineering (Basel) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Bioengineering (Basel) - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for Foot and Ankle Pathologies Have Significantly More Complications Compared With Hyaluronic Acid Injections, Saline Solution Injections, and Dry Needling: A Systematic Review.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 674 on Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, Tendon Injury, Ankle Injury, published in Arthroscopy (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 674
Arthroscopy1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Operative management of osteochondral lesions of the talus: 2024 recommendations of the working group 'clinical tissue regeneration' of the German Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology (DGOU)
Systematic Review on Cartilage Damage, Ankle Injury, published in EFORT Open Rev (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2024
EFORT Open Rev23 citations - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Therapeutic Effect of Stem Cells from Different Sources on Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Meta-analysis on Ankle Injury, Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, published in Int J Low Extrem Wounds (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2024
Int J Low Extrem Wounds - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Visualized trends and bibliometric analysis in ankle cartilage repair from 2004 to 2024
Systematic Review on Cartilage Damage, Ankle Injury, published in Front Med (Lausanne) (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2024
Front Med (Lausanne) - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Adipose-derived stem cells applied to ankle pathologies: a systematic review.
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, Ankle Injury, Scar, published in Musculoskelet Surg (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2023
Musculoskelet Surg2 citations