Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMedOpen access

The Effect of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells on Wound Healing: Comparison of Methods of Application.

Kim H., Hyun MR., Kim SW.

Laboratory Study on Chronic Wound, published in Stem Cells Int (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Stem Cells Int (2019)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
31636674
PMCID
PMC6766154
DOI
10.1155/2019/2745640
Citations
21

Abstract (original English)

Impaired wound healing is a significant medical problem. Recently, cell-based therapy focused on stem cells has been developed to overcome the challenges of defective wound healing. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) in promoting wound healing, using different techniques for administering them. Dorsal full-thickness skin defects (1 × 1 cm) were created in three groups of mice that received intravenous ASCs by intravenous injection, intramuscular injection, and topical application, respectively. Three control groups received saline in the same ways. Wound healing was assessed clinically, wounds were examined histologically, and GFP-labelled ASCs were detected with an IVIS imaging system. The results revealed that ASCs accelerated wound healing independent of their mode of administration. Histological examination showed that the ASCs accelerated reepithelialization, and IVIS analysis indicated that many ASCs were present in the wound area and disappeared after wound healing.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research