Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

The effect of adipose tissue-derived stromal vascular fraction/gel material on wound healing in a rat model of nasal mucosa injury.

Erçelik O., Karadaş H., Kaptan Z., Bilgen AS., Samaraz Olgun P., Çaydere M.

Animal Study with a reported sample of 14 on Chronic Wound, Chronic Inflammation, published in Acta Otolaryngol (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Acta Otolaryngol (2024)
Country
England
Reported sample size
14
Source database
PubMed
PMID
39141586
DOI
10.1080/00016489.2024.2385594

Abstract (original English)

Background Stromal Vascular fraction/gel (SVF/gel) is prepared mechanically from autologous adipose tissue, and it is known for its regenerative and anti-inflammatory properties. Aims To assess histopathological effects of adipose tissue-derived SVF/gel and nasal steroids on nasal mucosal healing. Material and methods Forty-two Wistar Albino rats with right nasal mucosal injury were randomly divided into three groups: control (saline), Mometasone Furoate (MF), and SVF/gel. Control group ( n = 14) received saline for 7 days, while MF group ( n = 14) was administered MF to the right nasal cavity for 7 days. SVF/gel group ( n = 14) was treated once with SVF/gel in the right nasal cavity. Histological analysis on days 14 and 28 post-injury focused on evaluating epithelial thickness, inflammation, disarray, subepithelial thickness, goblet cell count, subepithelial fibrosis, presence of ciliated cells, lacunae, adhesion, and neo-osteogenesis. Results When comparing the MF and SVF/gel groups, statistically significant differences were found on day 14 in indices of epithelial thickness, subepithelial thickness, goblet cells, subepithelial fibrosis, and ciliated cells. On day 28, SVF/gel group exhibited higher ciliated cell counts and lower subepithelial fibrosis values ( p = .027; p = .016). Additionally, epithelial disarray, adhesions, lacunae, and neo-osteogenesis were not observed i

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsNasal MucosaRats, WistarAdipose TissueWound HealingRatsMometasone FuroateDisease Models, AnimalGelsRandom Allocation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research