Effect of autologous fat transfer in acute burn wound management: A randomized controlled study.

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

The use of fat grafting is being widely used for different indications one of which is wound healing. In this study we compare the use of autologous fat grafting (AFG) as a novel indication in acute burn wounds healing and burn scarring to the conventional methods of burn wound management both clinically and histologically. Several small observational studies demonstrated the effect of the AFG in healing of chronic wounds, different vascular ulcers or effect on scars yet no randomized controlled trial is available to compare its role with conventional methods. The study was a prospective, open-label single center, randomized control clinical trial included 100 patients with superficial and deep dermal burns from March 2019 to March 2020 randomized to AFG protocol consisted of a single injection of autologous fat grafting then dressed with nano fat (Group A) or conventional methods of serial dressings with 1% silver sulphadiazine or other topical agents (Group B). Inclusion criteria included newly admitted burn patients with affected total body surface area (TBSA) (10%-25%) while exclusion criteria included burns patients with affected TBSA of< 10% or> 25%, or loss of subcutaneous fat, fascia, muscles and bones, inhalational burn, and burns in genitalia, perineum and peri-anal areas and co-morbidity(ies) that might affect wound healing or eligibility for anaesthesia and surgery.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.