The Effect of Growth Factors on Vaginal Wound Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Surgical outcomes of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery are poor, resulting in a 20% recurrence risk. Following the hypothesis that impaired wound healing is the main determinant of recurrent POP, growth factors have the potential to promote wound healing and may improve surgical outcomes. In this study, we systematically reviewed the effect of growth factors on vaginal wound healing in both in vitro and animal studies. For each independent comparison, the standardized mean difference and 95% CI were calculated using the Hedges' g correction. Of the 3858 retrieved studies, seven studies were included, of which six were included in meta-analysis (three in vitro studies and four in vivo studies). In vitro , basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) promotes proliferation, differentiation, and collagen types I and III production. Epidermal growth factor stimulates proliferation and connective tissue growth factor promotes Tenascin-C expression. These effects, however, are less pronounced in vivo ; only bFGF slightly promotes collagen production. The review shows that growth factors, particularly bFGF, are able to promote vaginal wound healing in vitro . The uncertain in vivo findings suggest that preclinical models should be improved. The ultimate goal is to develop effective growth factor-supplemented therapies that improve surgical outcomes for POP.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.