Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

[Effect of nanofat combined with platelet-rich plasma for treatment of pressure injury wounds in rats].

Zhang M., Yu H., Shao Y., Song G., Chen M., Liu S.

Animal Study with a reported sample of 10 on Chronic Wound, published in Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao (2023)
Country
China
Reported sample size
10
Source database
PubMed
PMID
38189392
PMCID
PMC10774102
DOI
10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2023.12.10

Abstract (original English)

To investigate the effect of allogeneic nanofat combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for treatment of pressure injury wounds in rats. Forty SD rat models with pressure injury wounds were randomly divided into 4 groups ( n =10) for treatment with nanofat, PRP (platelet count about 6.2 times that of normal whole blood), nanofat combined with PRP, or PBS only (control group).Wound healing was observed on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14 and wound healing rate was calculated. On days 5, 10 and 14, tissue samples were taken from the wounds for HE staining, Masson staining, immunohistochemistry, and Western blotting to observe inflammatory cell infiltration, collagen formation, deposition and arrangement, angiogenesis, inflammatory factor expression and VEGF expression in the wounds. The combined treatment with nanofat and PRP achieved the highest wound healing rates at all the time points of observation ( P < 0.05), enhanced inflammatory cell infiltration on day 5, and accelerated dermal and epidermal growth compared with the other treatments ( P < 0.05). The combined treatment also more effectively promoted collagen expression and its regular arrangement ( P < 0.05) and enhanced angiogenesis in the wounds than nanofat and PRP alone, without significant difference between the latter two treatments ( P > 0.05). Immunohistochemistry and Western blotting showed that the expressions of MC

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyPressure UlcerVascular Endothelial Growth Factor APlatelet-Rich PlasmaCollagen

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research