Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceMeta-analysisEurope PMCOpen access

Effect of stem cell therapies on tendon-bone healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in animal models: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Zhao S., Wang C.

Meta-analysis on Tendon Injury, Ligament Injury, Chronic Wound, published in PLoS One (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceEvidence level of this study

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Meta-analysis
Journal
PLoS One (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41637439
PMCID
PMC12871951
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0341859
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Introduction Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is widely performed, yet insufficient tendon-bone healing remains a key contributor to graft failure. Stem cell-based interventions, including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and stem cell-derived products (e.g., exosomes/extracellular vesicles), have shown potential to enhance tendon-bone integration in preclinical models. However, findings across animal studies are heterogeneous and have not been comprehensively synthesized. This review aims to evaluate the effects of stem cell-based therapies on tendon-bone healing after ACL reconstruction in animal models. Methods and analysis This protocol follows PRISMA-P. We will search PubMed, Embase, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to the final search date. Controlled animal studies comparing ACL reconstruction with stem cell-based interventions versus controls will be included. Primary outcomes are biomechanical properties (ultimate failure load and stiffness). Secondary outcomes include micro-CT measures of bone integration (e.g., bone volume fraction, bone mineral density) and histological outcomes (e.g., interface maturation or validated scoring systems). Risk of bias will be assessed using SYRCLE's tool. Random-effects meta-analyses will be performed, with prespecified subgroup analyses by stem cell type, delivery method, animal

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence
Anterior Cruciate LigamentBone and BonesTendonsMesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsHumansDisease Models, AnimalStem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationWound Healing

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research