Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

The effect of stromal vascular fraction in an experimental frostbite injury model.

Öner Ç., Irmak F., Eken G., Öner BB., Karsıdağ SH.

Animal Study on Chronic Wound, published in Burns (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Burns (2022)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
35241296
DOI
10.1016/j.burns.2022.02.011
Citations
5

Abstract (original English)

Despite current treatment modalities, frostbite remains an injury with a poor prognosis which may cause functional morbidities. Several experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated that stromal vascular fraction is an autologous mixture, which can improve wound healing and vasculogenesis. The aim of this study was to show the beneficial effects of stromal vascular fraction on experimental frostbite healing. Stromal vascular fraction (SVF) was harvested from 5 rats after excision of the inguinal fat pads. Another 20 rats were separated into 2 groups of 10 as the SVF group and the control group. A frostbite injury was created on each rat using a cryoprobe frozen with liquid nitrogen (-196 °C). SVF was applied to the SVF group and phosphate-buffered saline to the control group. All injections were performed subcutaneously within the frostbite injury area. Biopsies were performed on days 5 and 14 for histopathological and immunochemical evaluations. The tissue perfusion rates of both groups were assessed on day 14 using indocyanine green angiography (SPY system). The increase in mean tissue perfusion was 373.3% ( ± 32.1) in the SVF group and 123.8% ( ± 16.3) in the control group (p < 0.001). The macroscopic wound reduction rates of the SVF and control groups were 25.5% ( ± 19.1) and 18.0% ( ± 5.9), respectively on day 5%, and 78.2% ( ± 9.2) and 57.3% ( ± 16.7) on day 14 (p =

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsRatsFibrosisFrostbiteInflammationNeovascularization, PathologicStromal Vascular FractionDisease Models, AnimalTreatment Outcome

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research