Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceSystematic ReviewPubMed

Effectiveness of the adipose stem cells in burn wound healing: literature review.

Oryan A., Alemzadeh E., Alemzadeh E., Barghi M., Zarei M., Salehiniya H.

Systematic Review on Chronic Wound, Burns, published in Cell Tissue Bank (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceEvidence level of this study

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Systematic Review
Journal
Cell Tissue Bank (2021)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
34561790
DOI
10.1007/s10561-021-09961-5
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Adipose- stem cells (ASCs) have received much attention in the recent years and several articles have investigated the role of these cells on burn wound healing. To understand the outcomes of the ASCs therapy on burn wound healing, a systematic review was performed. This study was conducted by searching in Pubmed, ISI, and Scopus until May 2021. Thirty-six animal studies were included in this study. The findings revealed that although treatment with ASCs somewhat enhanced the healing rate, cultured ASCs on scaffolds or its combination with hydrogels could significantly increase the viability of ASCs and promote rate of healing. However, clinical studies are necessary to gain a better understanding of the role of ASCs in burn wound healing.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsNeovascularization, PhysiologicCell DifferentiationWound HealingStem CellsBurns

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research