Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMedOpen access

Effects of platelet-rich plasma on cutaneous flap healing in rabbits: a pilot comparative experimental study with adipose tissue.

Tabaru A., Rüzgar S.

Animal Study on Chronic Wound, published in Sci Rep (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Sci Rep (2026)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
42034858
PMCID
PMC13280395
DOI
10.1038/s41598-026-49224-5

Abstract (original English)

Random-pattern cutaneous flaps are a mainstay in reconstructive surgery (especially in the head and neck region), yet their distal viability is often compromised by ischemia. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a concentration of autologous platelets rich in growth factors that stimulate angiogenesis, collagen deposition, and overall wound healing. Autologous adipose tissue, an abundant source of mesenchymal stem cells, has also been proposed to enhance neovascularization and tissue regeneration. This study aimed to compare the effects of PRP versus adipose tissue on the healing and survival of dorsal random-pattern cutaneous flaps in rabbits. Nine adult male New Zealand White rabbits underwent surgery, each having three dorsal skin flaps raised on their backs. Each rabbit served as its own control: one flap received no treatment, the second flap received autologous PRP injections, and the third flap received autologous adipose tissue injections. Clinical evaluations, including flap survival percentage, and histological assessments (necrosis, fibrosis, collagen deposition, vascularity, inflammation) were conducted on postoperative Days 7, 14, and 21. PRP-treated flaps showed directionally more favorable flap survival and histologic remodeling than adipose-treated and untreated flaps, with statistically significant between-group differences observed for collagen/fibrosis and vascular

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsRabbitsPlatelet-Rich PlasmaAdipose TissueWound HealingMaleSurgical FlapsPilot ProjectsNeovascularization, PhysiologicCollagen

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research