Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Effects of Varied Stimulation Parameters on Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Response to Low-Level Electrical Fields.

Hlavac N., Bousalis D., Ahmad RN., Pallack E., Vela A., Li Y.

Laboratory Study on Chronic Wound, published in Ann Biomed Eng (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Ann Biomed Eng (2021)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
34704163
PMCID
PMC10947800
DOI
10.1007/s10439-021-02875-z
Citations
14

Abstract (original English)

Exogenous electrical fields have been explored in regenerative medicine to increase cellular expression of pro-regenerative growth factors. Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) are attractive for regenerative applications, specifically for neural repair. Little is known about the relationship between low-level electrical stimulation (ES) and ASC regenerative potentiation. In this work, patterns of ASC expression and secretion of growth factors (i.e., secretome) were explored across a range of ES parameters. ASCs were stimulated with low-level stimulation (20 mV/mm) at varied pulse frequencies, durations, and with alternating versus direct current. Frequency and duration had the most significant effects on growth factor expression. While a range of stimulation frequencies (1, 20, 1000 Hz) applied intermittently (1 h × 3 days) induced upregulation of general wound healing factors, neural-specific factors were only increased at 1 Hz. Moreover, the most optimal expression of neural growth factors was achieved when ASCs were exposed to 1 Hz pulses continuously for 24 h. In evaluation of secretome, apparent inconsistencies were observed across biological replications. Nonetheless, ASC secretome (from 1 Hz, 24 h ES) caused significant increase in neurite extension compared to non-stimulated control. Overall, ASCs are sensitive to ES parameters at low field strengths, notably pulse freque

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AdipocytesCells, CulturedElectric StimulationHumansNerve Growth FactorsNeuritesSecretomeStem Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research