Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for dry eye disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Introduction Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial ocular surface disorder characterized by loss of tear film homeostasis, inflammation, neurosensory abnormalities, and epithelial damage. Despite the availability of topical immunomodulators and procedural interventions, a substantial proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe or refractory DED experience persistent symptoms and inadequate ocular surface recovery. Stem cell-based therapies, particularly mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and MSC-derived exosomes, have emerged as regenerative and immunomodulatory strategies aimed at restoring epithelial integrity and tear film stability rather than providing solely symptomatic relief. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of stem cell and stem cell-derived therapies in human DED. Methods This study followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251057372). Six databases were searched from inception to May 14, 2025. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed human clinical investigations evaluating stem cell-based interventions for DED and reporting objective efficacy outcomes such as Schirmer test, tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), or patient-reported outcomes including the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Pooled mean differences (MDs) or standardized mean d

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.