Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Electrical signature of heterogeneous human mesenchymal stem cells.

Tsai T., Vyas PD., Crowell LL., Tran M., Ward DW., Qin Y.

Animal Study on Immune Modulation, published in Electrophoresis (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Electrophoresis (2024)
Country
Germany
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
38738344
DOI
10.1002/elps.202300202

Abstract (original English)

Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) have gained traction in transplantation therapy due to their immunomodulatory, paracrine, immune-evasive, and multipotent differentiation potential. The inherent heterogeneity of hMSCs poses a challenge for therapeutic treatments and necessitates the identification of robust biomarkers to ensure reproducibility in both in vivo and in vitro experiments. In this study, we utilized dielectrophoresis (DEP), a label-free electrokinetic phenomenon, to investigate the heterogeneity of hMSCs derived from bone marrow (BM) and adipose tissue (AD). The electrical properties of BM-hMSCs were compared to homogeneous mouse fibroblasts (NIH-3T3), human fibroblasts (WS1), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293). The DEP profile of BM-hMSCs differed most from HEK-293 cells. We compared the DEP profiles of BM-hMSCs and AD-hMSCs and found that they have similar membrane capacitances, differing cytoplasm conductivity, and transient slopes. Inducing both populations to differentiate into adipocyte and osteoblast cells revealed that they behave differently in response to differentiation-inducing cytokines. Histology and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analyses of the differentiation-related genes revealed differences in heterogeneity between BM-hMSCs and AD-hMSCs. The differentiation profiles correlate well with the DEP p

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMiceAnimalsCell DifferentiationAdipose TissueElectrophoresisBone Marrow CellsHEK293 CellsCells, Cultured

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research