Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Engineered Cell Sheets for the Effective Delivery of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells for Tendon-to-Bone Healing.

Shin MJ., Shim IK., Kim DM., Choi JH., Lee YN., Jeon IH.

Animal Study on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, Chronic Wound, published in Am J Sports Med (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Am J Sports Med (2020)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
33136454
DOI
10.1177/0363546520964445
Citations
43

Abstract (original English)

Efforts are being made to treat rotator cuff tears (RCTs) that exhibit poor healing and high retear rates. Tendon-to-bone healing using mesenchymal stem cells is being explored, but research is needed to establish effective delivery options. To evaluate the effects of an adipose-derived stem cell (ADSC) sheet on mesenchymal stem cell delivery for tendon-to-bone healing of a chronic RCT in rats and to demonstrate that ADSC sheets enhance tendon-to-bone healing. Controlled laboratory study. Mesenchymal stem cells were obtained from rat adipose tissue, and a cell sheet was prepared using a temperature-responsive dish. To evaluate the efficacy of stem cells produced in a sheet for the lesion, the experiment was conducted with 3 groups: repair group, cell sheet transplantation after repair group, and cell sheet-only group. Histological, biomechanical, and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) results were compared among the groups. Hematoxylin and eosin staining for histomorphological analysis revealed that the cell sheet transplantation after repair group (5.75 ± 0.95) showed statistically significant higher scores than the repair (2.75 ± 0.50) and cell sheet-only (3.25 ± 0.50) groups ( P < .001). On safranin O staining, the cell sheet transplantation after repair group (0.51 ± 0.04 mm 2 ) had a larger fibrocartilage area than the repair (0.31 ± 0.06 mm 2 ) and cell sheet-only (0.32

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalRatsRotator CuffRotator Cuff InjuriesTendonsTissue EngineeringWound HealingX-Ray Microtomography

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research