Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMedOpen access

Engineered stromal vascular fraction for tissue regeneration.

Liu J., Li Y., Zhang Y., Zhao Z., Liu B.

Narrative Review on Cartilage Damage, Chronic Wound, published in Front Pharmacol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Front Pharmacol (2025)
Country
Switzerland
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
40183080
PMCID
PMC11966044
DOI
10.3389/fphar.2025.1510508
Citations
6

Abstract (original English)

The treatment of various tissue injuries presents significant challenges, particularly in the reconstruction of large and severe tissue defects, with conventional clinical methods often yielding suboptimal results. However, advances in engineering materials have introduced new possibilities for tissue repair. Bioactive components are commonly integrated with synthetic materials to enhance tissue reconstruction. Stromal vascular fraction (SVF), an adipose-derived cell cluster, has shown considerable potential in tissue regeneration due to its simple and efficient way of obtaining and its richness in growth factors. Therefore, this review illustrated the preparation, characterization, mechanism of action, and applications of engineered SVF in various tissue repair processes, to provide some references for the option of better methods for tissue defect reconstruction.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research