Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Engineering cardiac regeneration using stem cells: Cellular sources, differentiation signatures, targeted delivery, and functional recovery

Gupta S., Faiyazuddin M., Gupta V., Tanwar R., Rani P., Almagharbeh WT.

Narrative Review on Cardiovascular Disease, Immune Modulation, published in Regen Ther (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Regen Ther (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42125407
PMCID
PMC13158422
DOI
10.1016/j.reth.2026.101120

Abstract (original English)

Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of mortality worldwide, and the limited regenerative capacity of the adult heart continues to delay functional recovery, resulting in myocardial injury. Stem cell-based therapies offer a promising avenue for cardiac repair through mechanisms that include cardiomyogenic differentiation, paracrine signaling, angiogenic stimulation, and immunomodulation. Although pluripotent stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, and cardiac progenitor cells have demonstrated significant benefits in preclinical models, clinical translation has yielded modest functional improvements, mainly due to poor cell retention, electrical and structural immaturity of transplanted cells, immune-mediated clearance, and concerns regarding tumorigenicity and arrhythmogenicity. Therapeutic efficacy largely derives from extracellular vesicles, secreted microRNAs, pro-survival cytokines, and other bioactive substances released by cells. Direct replacement of cardiomyocytes is challenging because the host tissue environment limits the acceptance and stable integration of exogenous cells. Novel engineered cardiac patches, biomaterial-assisted cell delivery, gene-edited progenitor transplantation, exosome therapeutics, and cell-free therapy are improving safety, the plausibility of cell transplantation, and the precision of tissue targeting. Despite those biotech improveme

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research