Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Epicardial adipose stem cell sheets results in greater post-infarction survival than intramyocardial injections.

Hamdi H., Planat-Benard V., Bel A., Puymirat E., Geha R., Pidial L.

Animal Study with a reported sample of 24 on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Cardiovasc Res (2011) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Cardiovasc Res (2011)
Country
England
Reported sample size
24
Source database
PubMed
PMID
21565832
DOI
10.1093/cvr/cvr099

Abstract (original English)

Intramyocardial injections of cells can damage tissue and enhance dissociation-induced cell death. We assessed whether epicardial delivery of cell sheets could overcome these issues in a rat model of chronic myocardial infarction. Eighty-two rats that had undergone coronary ligation and simultaneous harvest of fat tissue to yield the adipose-derived stromal cell (ADSC) fraction were randomized 1 month after infarction to receive injections of either control medium (n= 24) or 10 × 10(6) autologous ADSC (n= 37) or the epicardial deposit, onto the infarcted area, of a trilayered ADSC sheet (10 × 10(6), n= 21) prepared by culturing cells on temperature-sensitive dishes. Some treated rats received green fluorescent protein labelled ADSC. Survival, function, and cell engraftment were blindly assessed after 2 months. Prior to implantation, cell sheets and suspended cells were assessed for the expression of extracellular matrix constituents and molecules involved in angiogenesis and cardiac remodelling. The survival rate of rats receiving the cell sheets was significantly higher than after cell injections (73 vs. 41%, P = 0.01). This correlated with the absence of left ventricular (LV) remodelling in the cell sheet group, as end-diastolic volume only increased by 2.8% compared with baseline [95% confidence interval (CI): -18.7%; +30.0%, P = 0.81] vs. increases of 25.9% (-0.4%; +59.2%,

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Angiogenic ProteinsAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCells, CulturedDisease Models, AnimalExtracellular Matrix ProteinsFemaleGreen Fluorescent Proteins

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research