Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Epicardial patches for myocardial repair: circumventing barriers to heal ischemic heart tissue.

Winkelbauer M., Generali M., Cheng K., Emmert MY., Chansoria P.

Narrative Review on Cardiovascular Disease, Scar, published in Trends Biotechnol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Trends Biotechnol (2026)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41794639
DOI
10.1016/j.tibtech.2026.01.014

Abstract (original English)

Ischemic heart disease, which leads to the loss of functional myocardium, remains the leading cause of death in late adulthood. Epicardial patches have emerged as a promising adjunctive strategy for myocardial repair. However, owing to the thick epicardial barrier (epicardial adipose tissue), only a select few approaches have demonstrated reduced scarring and improved heart function in large animal models and early-stage human trials. In this opinion article, we examine the different mechanisms and approaches to overcome the epicardial barrier. We further discuss key design and material considerations to improve safety and efficacy in clinical applications. Finally, we provide a summary of current regulatory and clinical challenges, together with proposed future research directions and foci in the translation of epicardial patches.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research