Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Evaluating composite PRF-fat-matrix strategies for soft-tissue augmentation: A preliminary screening study in a porcine model

Fiala M., Rotschein P., Plánka L., Jeklová E., Zaporozhets V., Hokynková A.

Laboratory Study on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in JPRAS Open (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
JPRAS Open (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41809684
PMCID
PMC12969459
DOI
10.1016/j.jpra.2026.01.052

Abstract (original English)

Soft-tissue augmentation using lipografting remains challenging in constrained recipient environments characterized by scarring, limited vascularity, restricted volume, and high demands on shape stability and tissue quality. Secondary correction of the soft palate in velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) represents a clinically relevant example of such conditions. A porcine dorsal skin model was designed to simulate a vascularly compromised recipient environment using standardized full-thickness defects covered in selected groups with split-thickness skin grafts (STSG). In this model (3 × 3 cm defects), spontaneous healing, STSG alone, autologous fat grafting, fat combined with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), and fat + PRF combined with an acellular dermal matrix (ADM; MatriDerm®), a non-dermal acellular matrix (ANDM; DuraGen Plus®), or an absorbable gelatin matrix (AGM; Cutanplast®) were compared. Macroscopic healing was evaluated at 3 and 5 weeks, focusing on exudation, contraction, and geometry preservation. Fat + PRF showed reduced exudation and improved surface quality compared with other composite approaches. Matrix-based combinations were technically feasible but associated with increased exudation, while AGM demonstrated better preservation of defect geometry. These findings indicate that the proposed porcine model is suitable for detecting differences between composite lipogr

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research